Voted for the Seven Wonders

I voted today, with the help of my son, on what we thought the new 7 wonders should be. Can I tell you how my vote went? Is that spilling the beans? No? Good!

We chose: the Statue of Liberty, Chichén Itzá, the Acropolis, the Colosseum of Rome, Machu Picchu, the Great Wall, and the Pyramids of Giza.

Apparently you can vote twice. You can vote via the Internet and telephone. When I was done with the voting process and confirmed my vote, I was offered a chance to vote again by phone. So you can be heard twice if you so desire.

I did not like that they made you give your gender and name for your vote to count. It is not a survey, so gender should have been optional and your full name should never be necessary. We are not voting for a world leader here. I am sure this is supposed to help curb the multiple voting by one person. But there certainly can be several people with the same name. Your required email address should have been sufficient.

Great photos!

Leesa’s woodpeckerI had dreams as a teen of being a great photographer. I ended up going into the darkroom instead of behind the lens. I worked my way through high school and college in a photo lab. I still enjoy it as a hobby today.

Anyway, back to the point.

I saw some tremendous photos today. I was reading one of my regular blog stops of the day when Terry linked over to Leesa’s flickr page and her photoblog site. I was stunned by the incredible work she has done with a camera. She has a blog and store where you can buy some of her work.

Just some great work by a true artist. I only dreamed of shots like these. I have taken some truely amazing pictures in my day. But fewer than the number of fingers I have on my hands. Leesa probably gets more than 10 wonderful shots each time she turns on her camera.

Praise team

Ever been to a church with a Praise or Worship team? I am not going to argue the goodness or badness of it, I just want to give some thoughts on the subject. Though, in doing some quick reading, I did come across an idea that I like which carries great validity.

But first, why did this come up?

I was at a church tonight that has a praise team. I have been there a few times before. In general I do not like their style of music, but the pastor is a friend and he is having special meetings this week. So I went. I saw something though that I often see with these praise teams. A couple of the singers were singing and swaying and screwing up their faces like they were “working up” the emotion to praise the Lord.

Do they sing like that when they are not in front of the congregation? I have seen it some times. I have spent many hours on the platform of churches during song services and I have to say I have seen some people working up a sweat with their facial expressions…but rarely. In a church of 400 there might be one, or three. But on many praise/worship teams there are usually a couple or a few who look like they are putting on the best performance their high school acting classes could teach them.

Why? Why do you have to sing differently when everyone is looking at you than when no one is looking at you? Who are you singing for? To praise God or to be seen of men? I admit that you should at least look like you are excited to be alive and be used by God, but should you go over board on that?

Now back to my reading and a response to the issue.

There are two legitimate arguments that I can think of right off that would warrant having more than one song leader. One is that there is biblical precedence for having congregational music led by more than one voice. You see in the Old Testament, on a couple of occasions, where the congregation of Israel was lead by selected priests in music. Not just one person leading, but a group of people leading the worship in song.

The second argument for having a team of song leaders is so that you can more easily harmonize the music. If you have one song leader, then you hear one voice. How many of you know the melody line of every song in the hymnbook, but do not know any of the other parts of harmony? It happens. Especially when you have just one leader.

That brings us to the potential need to have a team of song leaders. You are lead in worship by a group which can provide the harmony to the congregation thus enabling them to sing a more pleasant praise or worship to the Lord. It used to be called a choir and worked for many many years without the showboating or other issues that seem to be introduced into the church by a small group praise/worship team.

Was the choir such a wicked thing that we had to throw it out?

Steve Jobs again

This time it has nothing to do with DRM though. He was talking to an education reform group this week and asked, “What kind of person could you get to run a small business if you told them that when they came in they couldn’t get rid of people that they thought weren’t any good?” He went on to say that is what principals of schools are asked to do all the time when working with teachers unions.

I have never really paid attention to Mr. Jobs before, but these last two weeks have raised my opinion of the man.

Steve Jobs for President!

Well, at least I agree with him on 2 issues.

DRM Fallout

Here is some more DRM (digital rights management) news. A survey was taken by the BBC before Steve Jobs’ surprising article last week where he called for a reasonable end to DRM for digital music.

The survey actually predates Jobs’ announcement by more than a month and found that 62% of music company executives believe that dropping DRM would help the uptake of digital music sales. I certainly agree with this. I don’t currently buy (much) music on-line as I feel like it is a waste of money. Why would I want to buy DRM’d music online and limit the use of my music? If I buy a CD, I can put it on my iPod, my iRiver, my Linux machine, my Mac machine and my Windows machine. I can also drop the music that I have ripped onto a CD in MP3 format or onto a USB drive and play it on my car stereo.

Buying crippled or limited music online is a horrible mistake.

It came out this week that EMI would be willing to entertain the idea of making their music available without DRM. They have already done trial releases of some of their music digitally without DRM. I like this because my favorite artist is signed with them, Christopher Parkening.

A quote from a USA Today article says, “EMI wouldn’t have to worry about pirates, because anyone who wants to pirate music is already doing it. The paying customer is a different breed.” That would be true for all the labels. Pirates are already doing what they do. Making music easier to own will not make pirating worse, it will only endear the consumer to the label that provides the music in a usable digital format.